15. THE NEW MEDICAL-INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX
One of the hottest new growth industries on Wall Street is the mushrooming
medical-industrial complex -- profiting from the sick and elderly. Net
earnings of health-care corporations with public stock shares rose 30
to 35 percent in 1979, and were expected to grow by another 20 to 25
percent in 1980.
Services that were previously provided by non-profit institutions or
individual practitioners are increasingly being taken over by a growing
array of private corporations whose principal concern is supply health
care services to patients for profit. Primary growth areas are proprietary
hospitals, diagnostic laboratories, hemodialysis treatment centers,
and proprietary nursing homes. Gross income for such industries has
been estimated at approximately $35 to $40 billion in 1970. Total health
care expenditures now approach 10 percent of the gross national product.
Who are the beneficiaries of the new Wall Street wonder stocks? Clearly,
the stockholders. And physicians themselves often have direct financial
interests in the new growth industries. They also serve on the boards
of many major health-care corporations and are well-represented among
stockholders of these firms. This raises obvious conflict of interest
questions. Can the physician remain an impartial trustee of his patient's
welfare while preoccupied with sustaining the profits of a new health
center? This incursion of the private enterprise profit motive into
a sector of vital public services has been virtually unheeded and uninvestigated
to date. As the commercial health care sector has grown, it also has
been accused of "cream-skimming." By concentrating on the
most profitable services for the best-paying patients, the new corporations
have relegated the less-profitable table services and unprofitable patients
to nonprofit hospitals. The for-profit institutions also have eliminated
residency and educational programs, such as are offered by the non-profit
hospitals.
Also debatable is the industry's capitalization on publicly-funded
research projects. Most medical research today is publicly funded through
academic or individual research grants. For example, university scientists
are the primary researchers in the DNA (biotechnology) field. The researcher
often will have a direct link with one of the genetic engineering firms
by sitting on its scientific board or holding stock.
The serious charges concerning the health profession came from an authoritative
source. Arnold S. Relman, M.D., Editor of The New England Journal of
Medicine, has deplored the dearth of information and statistics on the
medical-industrial complex. He has called on the American Medical Association
to incorporate some restraints against economic conflicts of interest
into the Medical Ethics code.
What does all this portend for the American consumer? Medical profits
will grow fatter, medical bills will continue to skyrocket, insurance
rates will rise, services will become increasingly specialized and fragmented,
and your physician may be first a businessman and only secondarily a
healer.
The failure of the media to inform the public of the ominous development
of the medical-industrial complex qualifies this story for nomination
as one of the "best censored" stories of 1980.
SOURCES:
The New England Journal of Medicine, Oct. 23, 1980, "The New Medical-Industrial
Complex," by Arnold S. Relman; The Guardian, July 30, 1980, "Profit
Motive Key to DNA Research," by Kathy Yih.