22. Academia at Risk as Tenured Professors Vanish
Sources: ON CAMPUS, Title: "The Vanishing Professor,"
Date: September 1998, Author: Barbara McKenna
SSU Censored Researchers:
Jason L. Sanders, Yuki Ishizaki, and Aimee Polacci
SSU Faculty Evaluator: Perry
Marker
AFT HIGHER EDUCATION DEPARTMENT REPORT, Title: "The Vanishing
Professor," http//www.aft.org
The bedrock of higher education, tenured
full-time faculty, have become an endangered species. According to the American
Federation of Teachers (AFT), the number of tenured full-time faculty is rapidly
decreasing on college campuses. Full-time faculty are being replaced by part-time
faculty who are paid two-thirds what tenured professors earn, and receive substandard
benefits. At least 43 percent of college instructors nationwide are now part-time
faculty. The hiring of part-time lecturers increased by 266 percent between 1979
and 1995.
In 1995, 51 percent of the new fulltime faculty were appointed to short
term, year-to-year positions, which were ineligible for tenure. From
1975 to 1995, the number of full-time instructors on the tenure track
actually decreased nationally by 12 percent.
At the University of California, the
budget has been cut dramatically since the beginning of the 1990s and the university
encouraged over 2,000 early retirements. Today, the teaching staff at the University
of California is comprised of only 20 percent tenured or tenure-track faculty;
the remainder is made up of 58.2 percent graduate students, 11.6 percent part-timers,
and 8.9 percent non-tenure-track instructors.
The City University of New
York system, the premier urban higher education system in the United States, suffered
a 21 percent decline of full-time faculty between 1987 and 1997.
Nationally, over two-thirds of all faculty at Community Colleges are
part-time. On the 106-campus California Com-munity College system, the
number of full-time faculty decreased by 8 percent in the last decade
while the actual number of students increased by 8 percent. Part-time
lecturers have taken up the slack, along with increasing class sizes
and speed-ups for the remaining faculty. Today 30,000 part-time faculty,
representing twice as many instructors as the full-time tenure faculty,
teach 40 percent of the courses in the California Community Colleges.
Part-time
faculty are not paid to serve on university committees, seldom participate in
shared governance, and are treated as hired hands with lower pay and benefits
within university communities. This diminished involvement on campuses can have
a demoralizing effect on classroom performance, student access, and the university
community as a whole. Tenured faculty have the advantage of being able to maintain
high academic standards for students, while temporary part-time faculty may try
to please students by giving higher grades and lowering requirements in order
to insure higher student evaluations on their performance.
Higher education research in the United States leads the world. Research
requires sustained periods of study and experimentation. The increased
use of temporary faculty will eventually undermine this important function
in the United States.
UPDATE BY AUTHOR BARBARA MCKENNA: "The declining number
of full-time tenured faculty is a story that tends to get lost within
the larger story of the forces transforming higher education in the
1990s. At the beginning of the decade, cash-strapped states cut funding
of the public universities and two-year colleges. When the state economies
bounced back, higher education funding did not. Thus, institutions set
a course of 'doing more with less' that has brought a progression of
lean, mean accommodations. These include corporatizing and downsizing
operations and service, relying on a less expensive labor force (part-time
and adjunct faculty, full-time, temporary instructors, graduate teaching
assistants), and embracing technology and distance learning as an alternative
to providing face-to-face instruction. If the effect of these accommodations
would be a decline in the quality of education provided, it would be
the full-time tenured faculty who, in a proprietary way, would note
it and oppose it. Quietly allowing these faculty to retire and not be
replaced makes it easier for institutions to put cost efficiency, rather
than educational quality and serving students, as their first priority.
"This story
has generated great interest among college faculty, some of whom have contacted
our union for information on how they might fight the trend. Many readers have
shared the story with their college administrations, to remind them that the vanishing
professor trend will have an effect on quality down the road. We know they've
also sent copies to state legislators. We are not aware of any mainstream press
response.
The story was based on a longer report by the same name released by
the American Federation of Teachers in July 1998. The report is available
at http://www.aft.org/highedue/professor."