13. Schwarzenegger Met with Enron's Key Lay Before
the California Recall
COMMON DREAMS, August 17, 2003
Title:
"Ahnuld, Ken Lay, George Bush, Dick Cheney, and Gray Davis"
Author:
Jason Leopold
THE LONDON OBSERVER, October 6, 2003
Title: "Arnold
Unplugged- It's Hasta la Vista to $9 Billion"
Author: Greg Palast
Additional
Sources:
San Francisco Chronicle and CommonDreams, October 11,2003
Title:
"Schwarzenegger Electricity Plan Fuels Fears of Another Debacle"
Author:
Zachary Coile
San Francisco Chronicle, May 26, 2001
Title: "Enron's
Secret Bid to Save Deregulation: Private Meeting With Prominent Californians"
Authors:
Christian Berthelsen, Scott Winokur, Chronicle Staff Writers
Faculty Evaluators:
Laurie Dawson, John Lund
Student Researchers: Karina Pinon, Chris Bui and Josh
Sisco
Arnold Schwarzenegger's "solutions to California's energy
woes" reflect those of former Enron chief Ken Lay. On May 17, 2001, in the
midst of California's energy crisis, which was largely caused by Enron's scandalous
energy market manipulation, Schwarzenegger met with Lay to discuss "fixing"
California's energy crisis. Plans to "get deregulation right this time"
called for more rate increases, an end to state and federal investigations, and
less regulation. While California Governor Gray Davis and Lieutenant Governor
Cruz Bustamante were taking direct action to re-regulate Califonia's energy and
get back the $9 billion that was vacuumed out of California by Enron and other
energy companies, Schwarzenegger was being groomed to overthrow Davis in the recall.
Thus canceling plans to re-regulate and recoup the $9 billion.
After the
California's energy debacle of 2000, Davis and Bustamante filed suit under California's
unique Civil Code provision 17200, the "Unfair Business Practices Act,"
which would order all power companies, including Enron, to repay the nearly $9
billion they extorted from California citizens. The single biggest opponent of
the suit, with the most to lose, was Enron's CEO, Ken Lay.
Lay, a very
close friend and long time associate of President Bush and Vice-president Cheney,
and one of their largest campaign contributors, hastily assembled a meeting with
prominent Californians (confirmed by the release of 34 pages of internal Enron
email) to strategize opposition to the Davis-Bustamante campaign and garner influential
support for energy deregulation.
Included in the meeting were Michael Milken,
"junk bond king" convicted of fraud in 1990 who currently runs a think
tank in Santa Monica that focuses on global and regional economies; Ray Irani,
Chief Executive of Occidental Petroleum; former Los Angeles Mayor Richard Riordan;
and movie star Arnold Schwarzenegger. (Riordan and Schwarzenegger were at that
time being courted as GOP gubernatorial candidates.)
Attendees of the meeting
received a small four-page packet entitled "Comprehensive Solution for California."
The packet called for an end to the federal and state investigations into Enron's
role in California's energy crisis and proposed saddling consumers with the $9
billion loss. Discussions further focused on preventing Davis's proposed re-regulation
of energy markets.
With Davis in office and Bustamante his natural successor,
there would be little chance of dismissing rock-solid charges of fraudulent reporting
of sales transactions, fake power delivery scheduling, and blatant conspiracy.
The grooming of a governor amenable to a laissez-faire and corrupt energy market
was essential. Recalling Davis and replacing him with Schwarzenegger was the solution.
With Governor Schwarzenegger in office, Bustamante's case is dead, as few judges
will let a case go to trial to protect a state whose governor has allowed the
matter to be "settled."
Governor Schwarzenegger is currently
preparing a push to deregulate California's electricity markets with an energy
strategy driven by some of the same members of former Gov. Pete Wilson's team
who led the push for energy deregulations in the 1990s.
Consumer groups
are warning that the Governor's proposals would expose electricity users to greater
fluctuations in prices while limiting state oversight of power trading-a combination
that could allow the type of market manipulation that plagued California during
the state's energy crisis of 2000-01.
"Deregulation has already cost
the state $50 billion, give or take," said Mike Florio, senior attorney for
the Utility reform Network, "Why on earth anyone would want to do that again
is mystifying to us."
UPDATE BY JASON LEOPOLD: There's a certain
amount of prejudice the mainstream media has toward investigative news stories
that are published by alternative news outlets. News stories appearing in alternative
publications are often dismissed or ignored by major news outlets as the work
of conspiracy theorists, to cite just one example.
Often times, reporters
for major newspapers never bother to follow up on a story printed in an alternative
publication because, the way they see it, if it was that important it would have
appeared in a bigger publication. Such was the case with the Arnold Schwarzenegger/Enron/George
Bush/Dick Cheney story, which I wrote about in August 2001 while Schwarzenegger
was campaigning for governor of California.
There were one or two major
newspapers that made scant reference to the secret meeting Schwarzenegger attended
in May 2001 at the Peninsula Hotel in Beverly Hills with Ken Lay, the disgraced
former chairman of Enron Corp, the energy company that exploited California's
electricity market for financial gain. Schwarzenegger was tapped by Lay because
of his celebrity clout in addition to the fact that he was being courted by Republicans
to replace Davis as governor.
But those publications failed to put the timing
of the meeting into context. Had they done so, it may have saved Gray Davis' job.
If they dug a little deeper, they would have found that while Schwarzenegger listened
to Lay's pitch on why California shouldn't abandon deregulation, one energy company
was nailed by federal energy regulators for shutting down it's power plants to
create an artificial shortage and boost wholesale prices in the state.
The
discovery, however, was kept secret by federal energy regulators so Vice President
Dick Cheney could release his National Energy Policy in May 2001. Had federal
energy regulators released the evidence of the manipulation that took place in
California it would have certainly derailed Cheney's energy policy since it called
for deregulating energy markets nationwide.
However, while Schwarzenegger
shook hands with Ken Lay, former Gov. Gray Davis was lobbying President Bush and
Cheney for price controls on soaring electricity prices. Bush and Cheney publicly
blamed Davis for the crisis, saying he was too slow to act and dismissed his claims
about an energy cartel manipulating the state's power market. That, in part, skewed
public opinion and left many in the state thinking that the crisis was Davis's
fault.
But, two years later, following Enron's bankruptcy, evidence emerged
proving Davis was right. Energy companies were manipulating the market and were
responsible for skyrocketing prices and blackouts. After I connected the dots,
showing how Schwarzenegger allowed himself to be courted by Lay, I asked him about
the meeting at the Peninsula. Schwarzenegger said he didn't remember.
But
now, three years to the day after he left the Peninsula with the outline Lay handed
him for keeping deregulation in place, Schwarzenegger is implementing Lay's vision.
In late April, the new governor sent a proposal to the state's Public Utilities
Commission urging regulators to reopen California's power market to competition.
Since this story was published, Reliant Energy was indicted by federal prosecutors
for manipulating the California electricity market, the first criminal charges
ever brought against a corporation related to the 2000-2001 energy crisis.
California's
energy woes are of particular importance today because the state's grid operator
is forecasting a shortage of electricity in the summer of 2004 if unusually high
heat blankets the state, which is exactly what the National Weather Service predicted
in early 2004.
For consumer groups, hot weather combined with a free market
is a recipe for disaster. They fear that a heat wave will force electricity prices
through the roof in a competitive market and that there aren't enough safeguards
in place to protect consumers from another round of manipulation.
Attorney
General Bill Lockyer agrees.
In April 2004, Lockyer published a 96-page
report saying that California's power market is still ripe for manipulation. Schwarzenegger,
meanwhile, won't heed the warnings. He's surrounded himself with a who's who of
special interests that are advising him on energy policy.
But Schwarzenegger's
aides won't reveal the identity of the people advising the governor on his energy
plan. In a page pulled straight out of President Bush and Dick Cheney's playbook
on government secrecy, Schwarzenegger's aides have refused to disclose the names
of the individuals who helped write the governor's energy plan, the one that was
sent to the state's Public Utilities Commission in April 2004.
The aides
claim that the governor met with consumer groups before drafting the state's energy
policy, but the state's three leading consumer groups, all of which have been
at the forefront of the energy debate since 1999 have never spoken with Schwarzenegger
or his staff. The governor's aides won't say which consumer groups he met with
or how many meetings he had. Not surprisingly, the consumer groups oppose the
governor's energy policy because it benefits big business at the expense of consumers
and puts the state in a vulnerable position again.
For more information
on this topic, the following websites are extremely useful.
Consumer groups
that have been on top of the energy story:The Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer
Rights, www.ftcr.org; The Utility Reform Network, www.turn.org; The Utility Consumers
Action Network, www.ucan.org. These government agencies publish the most up to
date news on the state's energy issues: The California Public Utilities Commission,
www.cpuc.ca.gov; The California Independent System Operator, www.caiso.com. To
monitor the state's refund issue: The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, www.ferc.fed.us.