7. Journalists Face Unprecedented Dangers to Life
and Livelihood
Sources:
www.truthout.org, Feb. 28, 2005, Title:
"Dead Messengers: How the U.S. Military Threatens Journalists,"
Author: Steve Weissman; http://www.truthout.org/docs_2005/022405A.shtml,
Title: "Media Repression in 'Liberated' Land," InterPress
Service, November 18, 2004, Author: Dahr Jamail; http://www.ipsnews.net/interna.asp?idnews=26333
Faculty Evaluator: Elizabeth Burch, Ph.D.
Student Researcher: Michelle Jesolva
According to the International Federation of Journalists (IFJ)1,
2004 was the deadliest year for reporters since 1980, when records began
to be kept. Over a 12-month span, 129 media workers were killed and
49 of those deaths occurred in the Iraqi conflict. According to independent
journalist Dahr Jamail, journalists are increasingly being detained
and threatened by the U.S.-installed interim government in Iraq. When
the only safety for a reporter is being embedded with the U.S. military,
the reported stories tend to have a positive spin. Non-embedded reporters
suffer the great risk of being identified as enemy targets by the military.
The most blatant attack on journalists occurred the morning of April
8, 2004, when the Third Infantry fired on the Palestine Hotel in Baghdad
killing cameramen Jose Couso and Taras Protsyuk and injuring three others.
The hotel served as headquarters for some 100 reporters and other media
workers. The Pentagon officials knew that the Palestine Hotel was full
of journalists and had assured the Associated Press that the U.S. would
not target the building. According to Truthout, the Army had refused
to release the records of its investigation. The Committee to Protect
Journalists, created in 1981 in order to protect colleagues abroad from
governments and others who have no use for free and independent media,
filed suit under the Freedom of Information Act to force the Army to
release its results. The sanitized copy of the releasable results showed
nothing more than a Commander inquiry.
Unsatisfied with the U.S. military's investigation, Reporters Without
Borders, an international organization that works to improve the legal
and physical safety of journalists worldwide, conducted their own investigation.
They gathered evidence from journalists in the Palestine Hotel at the
time of the attacks. These were eye witness accounts that the military
neglected to include in their report. The Reporters Without Borders
report also provided information disclosed by others embedded within
the U.S. Army, including the U.S. military soldiers and officers directly
involved in the attack. The report stated that the U.S. officials first
lied about what had happened during the Palestine Hotel attack and then,
in an official statement four months later, exonerated the U.S. Army
from any mistake of error in judgment. The investigation found that
the soldiers in the field did not know that the hotel was full of journalists.
Olga Rodriguez, a journalist present at the Palestine Hotel during the
attack, stated on KPFA's Democracy Now! that the soldiers and tanks
were present at the hotel 36 hours before the firing and that they had
even communicated with the soldiers.
There have been several other unusual journalist attacks, including:
In all cases, little investigation has been conducted, no findings
have been released and all soldiers involved have been exonerated.
At the World Economic Forum, on a panel titled: "Will Democracy
Survive the Media?," Eason Jordan, a CNN news chief, commented
that the U.S. commanders encourage hostility toward the media and fail
to protect journalists, especially those who choose not to embed themselves
under military control. According to Truthout, during a discussion about
the number of journalists killed during the Iraq war, Jordan stated
that he knew of 12 journalists who had not only been killed by U.S.
troops, but had been targeted. Jordan also insisted that U.S. soldiers
had deliberately shot at journalists. After the forum, Jordan recanted
the statements and was forced to resign his job of 23 years at CNN.
As a matter of military doctrine, the U.S. military dominates, at all
costs, every element of battle, including our perception of what they
do. The need for control leads the Pentagon to urge journalists to embed
themselves within the military, where they can go where they are told
and film and tell stories only from a pro-American point of view. The
Pentagon offers embedded journalists a great deal of protection. As
the Pentagon sees it, non-embedded eyes and ears do not have any military
significance, and unless Congress and the American people stop them,
the military will continue to target independent journalists. Admirals
and generals see the world one way, reporters another; the clash leads
to the deaths of too many journalists.
Update by Steve Weissman: When Truthout boss Marc Ash asked me earlier
this year to look into the Pentagon's killing of journalists, many reporters
believed that the military was purposely targeting them. But, as I quickly
found, the crime was more systemic and in many ways worse. As far as
anyone has yet proved, no commanding officer ever ordered a subordinate
to fire on journalists as such. Not at Baghdad's Palestine Hotel in
April 2003. Not at the Baghdad checkpoint where soldiers wounded Italian
journalist Giuliana Sgrena and killed her Secret Service protector in
March 2005. Andnot anywhere else in Iraq or Afghanistan.
How, then, did the U.S. military end up killing journalists?
It started with a simple decision-the Pentagon's absolute refusal to
take any responsibility for the lives of journalists who chose to work
independently rather than embed themselves in a British or American
military unit. Despite repeated requests from Reuters and other major
news organizations, Pentagon officials still refuse to take the steps
needed to reduce the threat to independent journalists:
1. The military must be forced to respect the work that independent
journalists do, protect them where possible, and train soldiers to recognize
the obvious differences between rocket launchers and TV cameras.
2. Commanders need to pass on information about the whereabouts of
journalists with a direct order not to shoot at them.
3. When soldiers do kill journalists, the Pentagon needs to hold them
responsible, something that no military investigation has yet done.
4. When the military tries to forcibly exclude journalists and otherwise
prevent "hostile information" about its operations, such as
its destruction of Falujah, Congress and the media need to step in and
force the Pentagon to back off.
One other problem needs urgent attention. Military intelligence regularly
monitors the uplink equipment that reporters use to transmit their stories
and communicate by satellite phone. But, as the BBC's Nik Gowing discovered,
the electronic intelligence mavens make no effort to distinguish between
journalistic communications and those of enemy forces. All the sensing
devices do is look for electronic traffic between the monitored uplinks
and known enemies.
In Gowing's view, this led the Americans to order a rocket attack on
the Kabul office of the Arab broadcaster Al Jazeera, whose journalists
kept regular contact with the Taliban as part of their journalistic
coverage.
To date, neither Congress nor the military have done what they need
to do to protect unembedded journalists and the information they provide.
More shamefully, the mass media continues to underplay the story.
But, for those who want it, reliable information is easily available,
either from the Committee to Protect Journalists, Reporters without
Borders, or the International Federation of Journalists.
NOTES
1. www.ifj.org.
2. "Missing ITN Crew May Have Come Under 'Friendly Fire,'"
www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/
Story/0,2763,919832,00.html, March 23, 2003.
3. Democracy Now! March 23, 2005, Wounded Spanish Journalist
Olga Rodriguez describes the U.S. Attack on the Palestine Hotel that
killed two of her colleagues.
4. Democracy Now! April 27, 2005, Giuliana Sgrena Blasts U.S.
Cover Up, Calls for U.S. and Italy to leave Iraq.